Housing, Affordability, and Election Promises: A Deep Dive Into the Final Leaders’ Debate
- Adam Bahrami
- Apr 28
- 4 min read
Australia’s housing crisis took centre stage during the highly anticipated final leaders’ debate between Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Opposition Leader Peter Dutton on 27 April 2025. As the cost of living continues to climb and home ownership feels increasingly out of reach for many Australians, both leaders faced pressing questions about their plans to address Australia’s housing shortage, affordability pressures, and the future of property development.
Here’s a detailed recap of what was discussed - and what it means for the housing and development sector.
The Housing Crisis: Setting the Stage
In 2025, Australia is facing one of its most severe housing shortages in history. Rising interest rates, construction costs, population growth, and planning bottlenecks have compounded an already stretched property market. According to recent data:
Australia remains on track to fall 462,000 homes short of the National Housing Accord’s 1.2 million target by 2029. (PCA-Mandala Partners)
Home prices are climbing again following February’s RBA rate cut. (News.com.au)
Vacancy rates across major cities are at historic lows, pushing rental costs sky-high. (Australian Property Update)
Voters are demanding action — and both Albanese and Dutton knew housing affordability would be a key battleground in the debate.

Albanese’s Approach: Building Supply, Supporting Renters
Prime Minister Albanese leaned heavily into Labor’s existing housing policies during the debate, highlighting:
The $10 billion Housing Australia Future Fund (HAFF), aimed at building 30,000 new social and affordable homes in the fund’s first five years.
The government’s push to unlock more housing supply by working with state governments to speed up planning approvals and zoning reforms.
Initiatives like the Help to Buy Scheme, offering an equity contribution to help first-home buyers enter the market with a smaller deposit.
Albanese also acknowledged the scale of the problem, admitting that while progress has been made, much more needed to be done to boost supply, protect renters, and support Australians at every income level.
He said:
“We need to build homes where Australians want to live — near jobs, transport, and services. That requires partnerships with states and councils, not finger-pointing.”
He defended the government’s record but emphasised that planning efficiency and accelerated land releases were critical next steps.

Dutton’s Pitch: Tax Incentives, Faster Approvals, and Private Sector Solutions
Opposition Leader Peter Dutton framed the crisis differently, criticising Labor’s approach as “too slow” and “bureaucratic”.
Dutton’s housing proposals included:
Tax incentives for private developers to build more homes, especially in outer suburbs and regional centres.
Fast-tracked approvals for residential development projects, arguing that red tape at state and council levels was choking supply.
A plan to decentralise housing growth by offering financial incentives for businesses and families to relocate to regional areas.
In a notable comment, Dutton argued:
“We need to unleash the private sector. Government programs are important, but we can’t solve the housing crisis with slow-moving funds and endless committees.”
However, Dutton was criticised for providing few details on how these reforms would be implemented or funded, particularly when pressed about the impact of migration on housing demand.

Points of Contention: Rental Reforms and Migration
One of the more heated exchanges of the night centred on rental affordability.
Albanese committed to stronger tenant protections, hinting at national minimum standards for rentals (although he stopped short of promising rent caps).
Dutton opposed rental controls, warning they could deter private investment in the rental market and worsen supply shortages.
The leaders also clashed on migration:
Dutton blamed high immigration levels for housing shortages and proposed temporary caps to ease housing pressures.
Albanese argued that migration settings were already being adjusted and that housing undersupply was primarily caused by systemic underbuilding over decades, not just recent migration trends.
What Industry Experts Are Saying
Following the debate, many real estate and construction experts weighed in:
REA Group noted that while rate cuts and increased listings are improving market sentiment, structural issues like supply bottlenecks remain the biggest challenge.
Canstar analysts pointed out that lower interest rates alone won’t fix the crisis without dramatic increases in housing approvals and completions.
Economists warned that policy stability and investment certainty would be crucial to encourage developers to commit to new projects, especially in the build-to-rent and affordable housing sectors.
In Canberra, discussions also highlighted the importance of balancing rental reforms with private investment incentives — a complex issue that neither side fully resolved during the debate.
Key Takeaways for Developers and Homebuilders
Political momentum is behind faster housing approvals. Regardless of who wins the election, expect a stronger focus on unlocking new supply through planning reform.
Affordable housing initiatives will expand. Programs supporting first-home buyers and renters are likely to grow, opening opportunities for developers targeting this segment.
Private sector incentives could be on the rise. Dutton’s tax incentive proposals, if implemented, could spur private investment, particularly in regional projects.
Migration and demographics will remain flashpoints. Builders and developers should plan for continued demand in urban hubs but stay alert to potential shifts in migration policy that could affect long-term housing needs.
Final Thoughts: What It Means for You
The 2025 election debate made it clear: solving Australia’s housing crisis won’t happen overnight. But whether it’s faster approvals, shared equity, or rental incentives, change is on the horizon.
At OwnerDeveloper, we’re committed to helping our clients navigate these shifts—turning political promises and market movements into real opportunities for smarter development.
Thinking about your next project?
Book a free consultation today for a feasibility check, strategy session, or a simple chat about where the market is heading.

Comments